I had no luck in the final of the 3 Quarks Daily contest for the best blog post in philosophy, but I was happy just to take part and make it that far. The three winners have been announced and you can see Akeel Bilgrami’s, who judged the final, comments behind the link as well.
The finalists for the 3 Quarks Daily philosophy blog post contest have been determined, and I’m pleased that my post on Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology has made it into the final. Here are all the finalists in alphabetical order:
It is perhaps worth noting that my post is really the only one in metaphysics — there weren’t even very many entries in metaphysics. The winners will be selected by Akeel Bilgrami and announced on September 22.
I’m pleased to report that my entry for the 3 Quarks Daily best philosophy blog post made it to the semifinals. Check out the other top 20 semifinalists on the website. Not necessarily a huge indication of esteem since anyone was eligible to vote for the entries, but nevertheless. Fingers crossed for a spot in the final! If you haven’t seen it yet, my entry is a post on Counterfactuals and Modal Epistemology.
Oh, and I can post this Semifinalist banner here as well:
I’d like to point any readers towards the vote on the best Philosophy Blog Post of the year at 3 Quarks Daily. My entry is number 33 and any votes will of course be much appreciated, if you happen to like the nominated post!
3 Quarks Daily calls for submissions for the 2nd annual prize for the best blog post in philosophy. The deadline is 11:59 pm EDT on August 31, 2010, and posts written within the last 12 months qualify. Akeel Bilgrami will act as the final judge and top 3 posts will receive a cash prize. I’m not sure about my own posts, but perhaps I will nominate one of them. Any suggestions, or indeed nominations of my posts, are very welcome.
Recent Publications Garmin Connect Activities
Recent Comments